Incorporation of indigenous approaches to guardianship in Canada

Great Bear Rainforest Conservation Agreement Press Conference in Vancouver. Dallas Smith, President of the Nanwakolas Tribal Council stands at podium. © Greenpeace

We have evaluated how indigenous approaches have been incorporated into Canada’s marine resource management policies.

Project leader: Dr Sarah-Jane Tiakiwai, Waikato-Tainui College for Research and Development

Duration: April 2016 – September 2016 
Budget: $185,000 
Status: Completed 

We studied two examples of ecosystem-based management (EBM) in Canada: the Marine Plan Partnership for the Pacific North Coast and the Great Bear Initiative. These are two distinct, yet linked, examples of resource management and economic development use EBM in a way that incorporates indigenous perspectives and aspirations. Canada, like New Zealand, has an indigenous population, environmental concerns, and has been actively working in the indigenous knowledge space.  

We reviewed literature on the Canadian case studies and engaged with First Nation peoples. We identified five elements to consider when developing EBM that successfully incorporates indigenous perspectives and aspirations, which could be applied to New Zealand’s marine management: 

  1. Power dynamics – Canada’s ‘enabling’ legal framework supported transformative shifts in policy making, engagement between First Nations and Government, and decision-making. 
  2. Jurisdiction – Any party that has jurisdiction over the location, resource and/or activities should be involved in developing EBM otherwise there is a risk of conflict and ineffective co-governance. 
  3. Adaptive management – ‘Learning by doing’, ie an iterative process that feeds back into future decision-making and adapts to uncertainty and/or changes in the ecosystem. 
  4. Agency – Ensuring indigenous people can participate in decision-making. 
  5. Recognition – Acknowledging indigenous knowledge as legitimate and using it alongside Western science through shared governance and participative bottom-up planning processes and monitoring. 

Journal articles

Research report

In the final report, researchers identified 5 elements to consider for developing EBM that successfully incorporates Māori perspectives and aspirations:

  1. Power dynamics – Canada’s ‘enabling’ legal framework supported transformative shifts in policy making, engagement between First Nations and government, and decision-making.
  2. Jurisdiction – Any party that has jurisdiction over the location, resource and/or activities should be involved in developing EBM otherwise there is a risk of conflict and ineffective co-governance.
  3. Adaptive management – ‘Learning by doing’, ie an iterative process that feeds back into future decision-making and adapts to uncertainty and/or changes in the ecosystem.
  4. Agency – Ensuring indigenous people are able to participate in decision-making.
  5. Recognition of indigenous knowledge – Acknowledging traditional ecological knowledge as a legitimate body of knowledge, and using it alongside Western science through shared governance and participative bottom-up planning processes and monitoring.

Latest news and updates

'Toolkit' for managing cumulative effects

The latest Resource Management Journal is a special issue about our collaborative research into how management of cumulative effects (CE) can be improved. It includes a suite of co-developed recommendations and guidance regarding how to progress work on CE management in Aotearoa.

Tracking the transport of ocean trash

A web-based interactive tool tracks how floating plastic waste moves around New Zealand's coastline. Initially designed as an educational tool for schools, the Ocean Plastic Simulator also has potential for environmental and biosecurity monitoring, and aquaculture.

Blue Economy theme: co-development and funding update

If you're interested in being involved in co-developing our core research projects and/or want notifications about our Innovation Fund then email sustainableseasNC@niwa.co.nz